Summary
In the book The Power of Their Ideas: Lessons for America from a Small School in Harlem Deborah Meier defends public education by sighting the successes of her small public school in East Harlem. Facing the challenges of both being located in one of the most economically depressed areas in the state, as well as reaching a student population with racial divides (1/2 African American and 1/3 Latino), Central Park East successfully produced college ready students. Her book starts with an explanation of the school she helped create, Central Park East Elementary School. This small school was originally set up in the wing of P.S 171 in East Harlem. The schools mission was to provide at the public school expense for the most disadvantaged students with what the most advantaged brought their private school children. After outlining the school’s beginning years and its’ successes Deborah uses the rest of the book to outline her philosophy as to why the school was successful, in an attempt guide other public schools in America.
While Deborah gives her blueprint to building successful public schools her most simplistic advice is that successful schools promote good teaching. Finding staff that are capable of reaching children is a necessity. Deborah goes onto to explain in her chapter on effective teaching, that teaching is about quick, instinctive behaviors. There are so many unintended actions we make daily as teachers, from “correcting a child’s writing, calling on students who don’t have the hand raised, complimenting a child on his or her clothing… all carry messages of importance, and all involve decisions that must be made instantaneously”(Meier, 139). So much of the culture in one’s classroom depends on these unintended responses, which as an administrator can be hard to gage potential candidates responses to these situations. Instead, Meier outlines qualities that effective teachers should demonstrate. Because she says it is nearly impossible to find candidates who display all of these qualities, it is up to the school to draw these qualities out of their teachers. These qualities include being reflective about how your students learn, and more importantly how they don’t learn. This is important because it allows the teacher to reflect on what isn’t working in the classroom, so their students get the most beneficial instruction for them. Sympathy towards others is another crucial trait. And most importantly, perseverance, energy and devotion are the character traits that successful teachers demonstrate.
Meier also raises a wonderful point about the importance of lessons. She says often teachers get too worried about covering standards. The point of education isn’t to learn content, but rather to learn how to think. She proposes that if a student is learning a lesson on the five causes of WWI, the importance of the lesson isn’t memorizing facts, but rather the process of investigating historical events. With this in mind, teacher driven lessons are considered weak and should be shy away from. Lessons that are teacher driven can be winged or spontaneously made up by good teachers. This happens because the workload and thinking is being done by the professional rather than the students. Optimally, a teacher’s efforts should be put on the planning rather than the delivery, so that the thinking is being done by the students.
Another reason for her success was because of the small school size. In public education Deborah believes that small school sizes are pivotal for many reasons. First of all, small schools are essential in creating thoughtful school cultures. The smaller the school is the easier it is to foster an environment of collective learning. In Harlem this was extremely important because they were trying to change the mentality of an entire community. Secondly, they allow experimentation to happen without treating students like guinea pigs. If something doesn’t work, in can be reversed the following day because logistics aren’t as complicated. And finally, personal relationships are the key. Deborah Meier preaches the importance of building these personal relationships, and believes that building those relationships made the success of her school possible. Teachers in small schools are able to learn specifically how their student learns and what suits them best. This kind of personal detail is another key to help creating successful public schools.
Response
Reading this book really made me question not only the way I teach but the way my school is run. I currently teach at a relatively small school serving low-income students. Immediately I began to think of how this could be an advantage for my students. Most teachers already have great personal relationships with their students, which can help increase the effectiveness of their instruction. However, what I don’t see is a school that makes quick changes in response to successes and failures of the school. Too often I feel as though administrators and teachers alike allow the failures of the school to continue because they are simply part of the norm. Deborah talks about the great advantages our schools have being small, as logistics can change quickly. What I believe the real problem is in our school is that although everyone talks about changing the culture and environment, they do it half heartily and aren’t truly behind it. It is easier to allow the failing routines to continue that to take initiative and risk by changing things. Our schools is blessed with small size so that logistics could change year to year or even day to day, however as faculty we are scared of change.
As far as my own teaching practices goes, one message from Deborah’s chapter on effective teaching truly struck a chord with me. She wrote about how often times teachers whom are skilled are able to wing lessons of the top of their heads, because they have superior critical thinking abilities. Deborah suggests that these “good teachers” are smarter than their peers, and therefore are able to deliver strong teacher driven lessons off the top of their heads. To be completely honest I do this often. I am able to show up to work with a post it with my objective and a couple of sample assessment questions written on it, and can create an entire lesson on the fly. Deborah explains how teachers who do this rob their students of chances to grow, because in these lessons it is the teacher who is doing all of the critical thinking in their heads. The reason they are able to make up lessons on the fly is because cognately they are able to think quickly, and have their brains racing a mile a minute throughout their lessons. Rather than having the class teacher driven, their efforts should be on planning lessons that have students drive the class. I believe this is truly the point of education, as students should be driving their own learning, not me standing up at the front of the room solving examples at the board. In the future I am going to try and continually remember that education isn’t the content we bestow on our children, but rather the skills we give them to critically think.
I like how your response took what you learned from your book and applied it to your own situation at your school. It seems as if while you were reading the book, you really tried to take things away to apply to your own teaching practices :)
ReplyDeleteGreat summary and application to your own school and classroom.
ReplyDeleteI took away three primary things from this summary. One Joe is the man. Two. I need to compliment my students more and just be more positive in class. Students get those emotions. When I am frustrated they always think I am frustrated at them, when most of the time its my lamo lessons. Number 3, I need to make sure my lesson plans are always about them thinking. I will try to keep that in my mind.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed Meier's quote about the unintended, yet important, actions we often take as teachers. It is interesting to hear her thoughts about how simple inquiries into our students' lives can have such a positive effect. Your self-reflection on planning lessons on the fly was eye-opening, since I have been guilty of being envious of teachers who are able to do so, as I was focusing on their mastery in their content area.
ReplyDeleteI agree about teacher and student driven lessons. Most of mine are teacher driven because that's how I grew up, and it's hard to visualize that change when I haven't experienced it. But I also think it's the point of education to teach students how to think, not about certain standards. I'm interested in how you mentioned that many teachers talk about making big reform changes, but very few fall in line with the big plan. Do you think that can be related to our experiences right now with the Teach For America movement?
ReplyDeleteJoe, I enjoyed your review and reflection. This book sounds truly inspiring, and reminds readers of the basics of quality education. I agree that administration and teachers sometimes don't adjust quickly enough, if at all when something is not working or is wrong. I hope that you see that voicing your opinions will make a difference because our Leeward schools sometimes need a wake-up call.
ReplyDeleteJoe, great post! I was blown away by your personal reflection, especially the section in which you relate what you learned from the book to your own experiences teaching at your school. I also found Meier's assertion that good teaching is more student-driven than teacher-driven particularly enlightening. After commenting on about 10+ blogs now, it seems that there is a consensus among most educators/ educational researchers that student-driven learning is the way to go. With that being said, it looks like I still have a long ways to go as a teacher. My lessons are still way too teacher-driven. I need to start putting the onus on students when I teach. It may be painful/ stressful at first, but it will definitely pay off dividends in the long run.
ReplyDeleteI would agree with the author the small class sizes are important. It seems that management problems become intensified the larger a class gets. I also agree with Joe about winging lessons. I do it a lot (out of necessity, really), but I disagree that I am robbing students of their ability to think critically as a result. In fact, most of the time, the students are doing the thinking at the same time I am. I also agree that relationships are key to investing students. As a teacher, I need to take more time to ask students questions about their future and get to know them on a more personal level.
ReplyDeleteSolid job. It's always interesting to hear from an administrative viewpoint. It is tough to have all the qualities of a great teacher so I like how she said "it is nearly impossible to find candidates who display all of these qualities, it is up to the school to draw these qualities out of their teachers." I am working on my flaws but I would like some help from my admin to faciliate this. I also agree with you that it is hard to change the status quo. Solid job. Strong Island.
ReplyDeleteI also really identified with needing to do better than making up lessons on the fly. I have definitely been guilty of that on occasion even though I know if I really sat down and worked at it, I could create something more student-focused that involved critical thinking. Great review, Joe!
ReplyDeleteGreat summary great reflection. I am sad/proud to admit that I too make up lessons on the fly. Unfortunately, some days its a great lesson and other it's a complete disaster. I predict as a second year teacher I will be able to think more critically and anticipate student needs.
ReplyDeleteGreat application of what you read in your own classroom. Student driven lesson development is great, as your review discussed, as it invests the students utilizing their strengths while making it easier to identify and address their weaknesses. I've tried to work in this vein, but fear that my on your own guided notes are not enough.
ReplyDeleteStrong summary and reflection Joe. I need to do a better job of planning out how to stimulate student thinking as well. I think you make a great point about your school. Joe Cuculo for principal in 2011?
ReplyDeleteGreat analysis Joseph Robert Cucolo! I gotta say, that kinda hits a little too close to home. On the one hand, I totally agree that many people do try to change things only half-heartedly with little belief that they anything good will actually happen. However, on the other side of the issue, having only worked one year, I can at least sympathize with those who may have lost a good deal of hope. You and I both know, that although we remain positive and hard working, an inappropriately large amount of resilience is necessary to keep the rosy attitudes we both possess.
ReplyDeleteI'm interested in this book in that it talks about a small school environment, while being centered in the public school system which is usually characterized as being a lot bigger. I think, while school size isn't everything, it might help to foster the type of environment that could be most beneficial for students. Things like holding students and teachers accountable through development in culture and general investment in one another and the institution- rather than merely punitive measures.
ReplyDelete